An early preview of a new documentary film by Mark Lane, author of “Rush To Judgment” and “Plausible Denial.” The new film A RUSH TO JUDGMENT is still in pro…
-
Recent Posts
- TRUMP will make America Great Again!
- WATCH: GOP Establishment Elites Discuss How to Stop Trump — ‘All He Has Going for Him Is a Lot of Votes’
- Judge Jeanine Knows Trump is Best Choice Wanted By the People
- Donald Trump is Best Choice for America!
- Dear Andrea B. Thomas, SVP of Sustainability at Walmart, Please boycott Cargill…
Recent Comments
- LRL on A Black Reporter Summarizes Barack – IMPEACH IN ORDER?
- Unique Fli on CIVIL UNREST and RIOTS Coming as America ‘s Poor Spend 60% of Income on Food and Housing!
- QAM YASHARAHLA on CIVIL UNREST and RIOTS Coming as America ‘s Poor Spend 60% of Income on Food and Housing!
- GMSNORTHCAROLINA24 on CIVIL UNREST and RIOTS Coming as America ‘s Poor Spend 60% of Income on Food and Housing!
- Markus Wolf on Dr. Mahathir Mohamad: America’s Drive towards Global Hegemony, Economic Warfare and Regime Change
Categories
-
Meta
Lane is right about one thing - “the American people have not been told the truth.” He is the biggest perpetrator of lies surrounding the Kennedy assassination. Lane has a made a career out of cherry-picking their testimony, often quoting people completely out of context, and then drawing the most bizarre conspiratorial conclusions. All this requires one to ignore a MOUNTAIN of evidence that Oswald was the assassin. And there is absolutely no evidence that Oswald worked in unison with the CIA.
In your dreams.
Glad to see Mr. Lane is still kicking. He was such a boss lighting that pipe with matches on the “Firing Line” with william buckley
@David Emerling
there is no MOUNTAIN of evidence, in fact there is not a SINGLE shred of evidence that oswald fired a shot that day. and you know it. all this so called evidence was planted before and after the fact to frame an innocent man. thats already proven a long time ago. just read “impossible: the case against lee harvey oswald” by barry krusch to watch your “mountain of evidence” dissapear more quickly than you can say CIA.
The way people in positions of power work when they want someone out or done in is they let the animals out of the zoo and leave a trail of bread crumbs to their house.
Mountain of evidence huh? Sure. And no evidence Oswald worked for the C.I.A. either? Yeah, nothing except that 201 File. Do you know what a 201 File at the C.I.A. is? It’s an employee file! And Mark Lane hasn’t “cherry picked” anyone’s testimony! Noone’s!!! Sorry sir, but, you have NOTHING to back up ANYTHING you’ve said!
No? Let’s not forget that Oswald WAS an informant for the FBI…and who was in control of the JFK assassination investigation? J. Edgar.Hoover. That’s how you get away with murder. Hoover says it’s Oswald……Kill or smear anyone who says it isn’t….
No, Oswald was *not* an informant with the FBI. Where did you get that? The FBI was seeking an interview with Oswald, but that was standard when somebody of interest (who tried to defect to the Soviet Union) moved around the country. They were usually contacted by the local FBI. That’s what Agent Hosty was trying to do – but he never connected with Oswald before the assassination. Oswald was never home. That didn’t make him an informant.
All the evidence indicates the assassin was Oswald.
Are you kidding me? You want to talk Agent Hosty? This guy admitted to BURNING A NOTE that he got from Oswald…..For the slow witted out there:
That “note” was EVIDENCE! I’m to believe him when he says It was insignifigant? Then Why did he BURN it? What Other EVIDENCE did he or the FBI destroy?
My final comment on the whole case: Had Kennedy survived, today with only half a brain, he could surmise that it was a conspiracy simply by LOOKING at the motorcade when it
turned on Elm. You could’ve lobbed a bowling ball into the President’s limo from the sixth floor. Car number two however would
have proven difficult to thread a laser beam into and hit anyone, what with a phalanx of agents ONBOARD and motorcycles surrounding it.
Hosty did destroy the note. He voluntarily took the note to his supervisor, Gordon Shanklin. There was even a memo about the note. That was also destroyed. Shanklin told him to destroy both. The concern was that Hoover would flip his lid if he knew that there was something the FBI could’ve known or done to prevent the assassination. If the note revealed Oswald’s violent character – somebody might say, “The FBI should have pursued that.” The FBI was trying distance itself from Oswald. 100% CYA.
thank you mr. bolden
Well, that clears it up for me. The very agency entrusted with getting to the perpetrators of the crime are trying to distance themselves from ties to the alleged assassin. Yessir I now believe everything in that cover story because there is no way they could’ve lied about either what evidence they destroyed, or the implications of that evidence. You have convinced me that the authorities are to be trusted in important matters… Incidently, that bullet in Oswald’s guts gave them distance.
Do you interpret this in a way that suggests that the FBI had direct involvement in an assassination plot? Do you interpret this in a way to suggest that the FBI knew what REALLY happened with the assassination but was covering up the truth?
It was neither. It was just the FBI behaving like a paranoid (because of Hoover) bureaucratic organization that was trying to cover its ass to avoid the possible allegation that, “They should’ve known about the threat Oswald posed to the president.”
black people are truly gods people, history supports it
If you believe that the Zapruder Film was manipulated…it’s main reason was to try and hide the slowing of the President’s limo either down to a stop or almost down to a stop. Has anyone done tests to see how slow the limo would have to be going for Agent Clint Hill to make it onto the limo?
Hoover interviewed George W. Bush about the possible Cuban reaction to the assassination…Jim Marrs investigations..(although he won’t touch the Bushes,,,they’re just too dangerous). Do a little reading, do some study(you look like you’ll be retired soon. Just know you’re..in the minority …probably..”for the other side. Always think: who is signing this guy’s paycheck. Nothing about you suggests any interest other than to provide disinformation. Please don’t disrupt these sites.
Listen to the material, the comments are…misleading…probably tracked by the bad guys.
Oswald worked for the FBI. He was infiltrating the CIA network controlling the anti-castro military teams to locate the arms stashes. He succeeded and FBI teams raided and confiscated a lot of the arms.
Hoover was ‘persuaded’ to assist the cover-up by Bush & Hunt who visited him a few days after Kennedy’s murder. Hoover planted two documents in his own records that disclose Oswald’s FBI employment and also George Bush’s involvement in Dallas (he and Hunt supervised the kill teams).
This is excellent and it is good to see Mark Lane again, still looking good for his years and still making solid news.
JACKIE FIRED THE FINAL SHOT . NO ARGUMENT !
Who ordered the cement barricade placed on Main St. leading to the freeway? There lies an important question that has never been answered. It may be THE most important question of all.
There are 4 books Mark Lane wrote about the Kennedy assassination
“Rush to Judgement”
“A Citizen’s Dissent” (how the media was used to attack him after Rush to Judgement) THIS is the book no one realizes is also about the JFK assassination–a “MUST” read.
“Plausible Denial”
“Last Word”
I got “A Citizen’s Dissent” from a book finder. Same with Garrison’s “Heritage of Stone”
PLEASE can anyone tell me WHEN this film will finally be released?
What about the film “Citizen Lane”?
Anyone?
Thanks for the correction. I must get the “Last Word”. I trust Lane’s books most of all. He was among the very first to notice something fishy about the JFK assassination and write about it. Thank God for people like him. I just read “Betrayal in Dallas” which does a good job of making the case for LBJ’s involvement (the one who benefited the most from the assassination). LBJ was about to be exposed regarding his ties to corrupt associates (Baker) when JFK was eliminated putting LBJ in charge.