Changeling: Christians becoming Pagan

 

This short video is the 304 imagery from NASA SDO during the course of the past week (From Friday, 3 May 2013 to Thursday, 9 May 2013). From this video you’l…
Solar Installation Course

Changeling: Christians becoming Pagan

Author: WorldsLastChance

The pagan names of the planetary week have been perpetuated in the calendar in use among the so-called Christian nations.  Every time we look at the calendar we have before us a constant reminder of the amalgamation of paganism and Christianity that took place as a result of the great religious apostasy – that “falling away” foretold by the apostle Paul, which occurred in the early centuries of the Christian church and made the modern Babel of conflicting sects and creeds which profess the name of Christ.(1)

It is understandable, though unfortunate, that modern Christians assume the week as it is known today has cycled continuously and without interruption ever since Creation: the entire world has been united in using the Gregorian calendar for 60 years while different parts of the western world accepted the Julian calendar almost 2,000 years ago!  However, ignorance of truth does not change what is truth; as God sadly observed in Hosea 4:6: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”  It is the responsibility of every individual to search out for themselves what is truth and live their lives by that knowledge.

The amalgamation of Christianity with paganism in the form of Mithraism was a process that took several hundred years.  Once the process was complete, the true Sabbath of the fourth commandment was lost under the assumption that the modern form of the planetary week had come down unchanged since Creation. While references to new Christians still clinging to pagan practices can be found in the New Testament, the biggest change crept in over calendation methods.  The solar Julian calendar with its continuous weekly cycle was very different from the luni-solar calendar used by the Jews and apostolic Christians.  Conducting business with a society that used a different method of tracking time was difficult.  As early as the last part of the first century, Ignatius “pioneered the movement toward substituting the Sunday observance for the Sabbath observance.”(2)

The Christians in Rome were among the first to begin worshipping by the Julian rather than the Biblical calendar.  This created confusion among the pagans.  Around A.D. 175-178, Celsus, a Roman philosopher and Stoic, wrote On the True Doctrine: A Discourse Against the Christians.(3)  This was a powerful denunciation of Christianity.  While his writing “exhibits comparatively little of the bitterness which characterized [most pagans’] attacks”(4) he nevertheless mocked Christians for copying the heathen.  “The result of his work was to place the Christian in a very unfavorable light in the eyes of the Romans and their rulers.”(5)

While no copies of Celsus’ work still exist, much of it was quoted in a massive work by Origen, Contra Celsum.  One quote particularly is fascinating because it refers to Mithraism and the planetary gods.(6)  It is interesting to note, too, that Origen did not try to refute any parallels Celsus drew between Christianity and Mithraism, but instead simply sought to evade the charges.(7)

The extent to which some Christians were embracing pagan practices confused many of the pagan Romans.  Tertullian (c. 160-225), an early Christian writer, wrote a defense of Christians which reveals the process then taking place with some Christians worshipping on Sunday, others on Saturday, still others clinging to the Biblical (lunar calculated) Sabbath.  His statements clearly reveal that Christians had been mistaken for Mithraists:

Others, certainly more cultured, think the Sun is the god of the Christians, because it is known that we pray toward the east and make a festivity upon the day of the Sun.  Do you do less?  Do not most of you, in affectation of worshipping the heavenly bodies, at times move your lips toward the sun rising.  You certainly are the ones who also received the Sun into the register of the seven days, and from among the days preferred it . . . .(8)

It is easy to see how Christians worshipping on Sunday would be confused with pagans.  The similarities claimed between Christ and Mithra include:

  • Both claimed to be mankind’s savior
  • Virgin birth, attended by shepherds
  • Traveling teacher; taught morality
  • Twelve followers
  • Miracles
  • Birthdate on December 25(9)
  • Sacrificed self for world peace
  • Buried in a tomb; resurrected the third day
  • Mankind’s savior
  • Known as the Good Shepherd and Light of the World; considered the Way, the Truth and the Life
  • Believers promised immortality

When Christians also adopted the Julian calendar for worship, the pagans could see little difference between Christianity and their own Mithraism, other than the Christian refusal to burn incense to the emperor, which was viewed as treason.  Another quote by Tertullian is very significant, again revealing the differing practices among Christians, with some worshipping on Sunday, others on Saturday which he shows to be a deviation from Jewish practice (the apostolic Christians at this time were still keeping the Sabbath by the Biblical calendar):

We shall be taken for Persians [Mithraists], perhaps . . . The reason for this, I suppose, is that it is known that we pray towards the east . . . Likewise, if we devote the day of the Sun to festivity (from a far different reason from Sun worship), we are in a second place from those who devote the day of Saturn, themselves also deviating by way of a Jewish custom of which they are ignorant.(10)

This quote affirms that worship on Saturday was itself a deviation from the Jewish custom of worship on the seventh-day of the original calendar.

Do not assume that because some Christians accepted pagan calendation and practices that the change occurred without protest from other Christians.  Apostolic Christians, those who strictly adhered to the teachings of the apostles and their immediate spiritual descendants, were greatly upset at what they saw as pagan apostasy creeping into the church.  The prejudice against Christians was extreme.  In fact, the main thrust of Tertullian’s work, the Apologeticum, was to defend Christianity against the unreasonable treatment of Christians by the pagans.

Tertullian, gifted with a biting wit and with great relish for irony, points out the inconsistent treatment of Christians versus common criminals by the magistrates.(11)  Whereas a common criminal was tortured until he confessed to a crime, Christians who confessed to being “Christian” were tortured until they denied it.  While Christians were accused of ritual incest and eating babies, such charges had never been proven.  Furthermore, Tertullian wryly observed, the pagans (who did abandon unwanted children) were so licentious that incest for them was an inevitable if unknown occurrence!

It is not for Christians today to judge those who lived through extreme persecution in the past.  However, it should be understood that paganism made inroads into Christendom only under extreme protest and through the blood of martyrs.  persecuted for being faithful to the bible sabbathThose who refused to drop a pinch of incense in honor of the “divine” emperor would often be forced to hold a handful of incense mixed with burning coals.  If the burning mixture was dropped out of reflex or if it fell only after the fingers were burned off, the pagans would rejoice that proper honor had been given the emperor.(12) 

Christians were also expected to offer a pinch of incense to the other Roman gods.  “Prayer to the planets on their respective days was a part of the worship of the heavenly bodies.”(13)  Some modern theologians acknowledge, “Yes, when the seventh-day Sabbath is calculated by the Biblical calendar, it will fall differently; but all God requires of us is to keep the seventh-day Sabbath by whatever calendar society uses.”  Such a belief reveals a tragic lack of knowledge of the issues at stake.  The planetary week with the seven astrological gods was clearly seen by apostolic Christians to be linked to demon worship.  Scripture is adamant that the rites of paganism are nothing but devil worship: “But I say, that the things which the Gentiles [pagans] sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.”(14)

The above illustration(15) found in Tortures and Torments of Christian Martyrs shows a martyr, figure A, being forced to hold a handful of burning coals.(16)  The caption reads: “Martyr whose hand is filled with incense mingled with live coals, and who being constrained by the pain to scatter the incense, is said to have made sacrifice to the idol.”  The cluster of thunderbolts in the customary shape of an X with a thick bisecting bolt, reveal the idol to be the planetary god, Jupiter.(17)  No true Christian, to save his life, would offer a pinch of incense to that day’s planetary god, not even Saturn – even if the seventh-day Sabbath on that lunation happened to coincide with Saturn’s day.  To do so would acknowledge Saturn as “god” of that day. 

Calendation encompasses much larger issues than has been understood.  The day on which one worships reveals which God/god is being worshipped.  The early Christians knew well that to worship by a pagan calendar was to give homage to a pagan god.  By worshipping on the Creator’s luni-solar calendar, they were declaring their allegiance to the God of Heaven.

Christianity’s acceptance of pagan calendation did not happen overnight.  Some Christians compromised on one point, others on another.  Some adhered strictly to the luni-solar calendar, while others kept the lunar Sabbath, but also acknowledged Sunday.  Still others kept both Saturday and Sunday, while some worshipped only on Sunday.  The compromises of one generation were taken a little further by the next. 

At every step in the course of the apostasy, at every step taken in adopting the forms of sun worship, and against the adoption and the observance of Sunday itself, there had been constant protest by all real Christians.  Those who remained faithful to Christ and to the truth of the pure word of God observed the Sabbath of the Lord according to the commandment, and according to the word of God which sets forth the Sabbath as the sign by which the Lord, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, is distinguished from all other gods.  These accordingly protested against every phase and form of sun worship.  Others compromised, especially in the East, by observing both Sabbath and Sunday.  But in the west under Roman influences and under the leadership of the church and the bishopric of Rome, Sunday alone was adopted and observed.(18)

Because the calendars were so different, every area of life was necessarily affected.  Those who did not have a heart-commitment to pure doctrine found it easy to excuse away their compromise.  Scholars believe that Eusebius of Caesarea was the first ecclesiastical writer to spiritualize the pagan name of “Sunday” to make it more palatable for Christians.  He said of dies Solis, Sunday: “on it to our souls the Sun of Righteousness rose.”(19)  He further wrote of seeing “the face of the glory of Christ, and to behold the day of His light.”(20)

A record of the Christian transition to pagan calendation has been preserved in various sepulchral inscriptions.  One Christian inscription refers to dies Mercurii (day of Mercury) in its text.  The epitaph’s date is believed to be either A.D. 291 or 302.(21)  Another Christian inscription, one of the oldest dated ones to be discovered in Rome, refers to dies Veneris (day of Venus).  What sets this particular inscription apart is that it lists both the Julian date and the luni-solar date!  Dated A.D. 269, it states:

In the consulship of Claudius and Paternus, on the Nones of November, on the day of Venus, and on the 24th day of the lunar month, Leuces placed [this memorial] to her very dear daughter Severa, and to Thy Holy Spirit.  She died [at the age] of 55 years, and 11 months [and] 10 days.(22)

The “Nones” of November is November 5 which fell on the day of Venus, Friday.  On that lunation this corresponded with the 24th day of the lunar month, or “Second Day” on the Biblical week.

This slow metamorphosis from pure, apostolic Christianity, to a Christianity intertwined with pagan calendation principles is largely responsible for the lack of knowledge existing today regarding the true calendar of the Creator.  The pagan continuous weekly cycle reaches so far back in history, it is assumed that a continuous weekly cycle has always existed.  The historical facts of the Julian calendar have been forgotten and circular reasoning has been used to “prove” that Saturday is the Bible Sabbath: i.e., the modern Gregorian week has continuously cycling seven-day weeks therefore weeks have always cycled continuously.  Saturday, then, must be the “seventh-day Sabbath” of the fourth commandment. 

Catholics and Protestants worshipping on Sunday, the first day of the Gregorian week, has been taken as further “proof” that Saturday is the seventh-day Sabbath of the Bible.  After all, “If Saturday is not the true Sabbath, why would Satan bother with having people worship on Sunday?”  This double deception has affirmed Saturday sabbatarians in their assumption that Saturday is the Bible Sabbath.  However, the facts of history shine light through the darkness of error and tradition to reveal the pagan origins of both modern days of worship, Sunday and Saturday.

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

(1) R. L. Odom, Sunday in Roman Paganism, (New York: TEACH Services, Inc., 2003), p. 202.

(2) Eviatar Zerubavel, The Seven Day Circle, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 22; Ignatius, Epistle to the Magnesians, (The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Grand Rapids, Michigan: W. B. Eerdmans, 1956, James Donaldson and Alexander Roberts, eds.), Vol. 1, pp. 59-65.

(3) See On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffmann, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

(4) “Celsus the Platonist,”Catholic Encyclopedia, NewAdvent.org.

(5) Odom, op. cit.,p. 54.

(6) Origen, Against Celsus, book 6, chapter 22 in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913), Vol. 4, p. 583.

(7)Ibid.

(8) Tertullian, Ad Nationes, Book 1, Chapter 13 in J. P. Migne, Patrologiæ Latinæ Cursus Completus, (Paris, 1844-1855), Volume 1, columns 369-372.

(9) While Christ was not born on Dec. 25, it remains modern Christendom’s “official” birthday for the Messiah.

(10) Tertullian, Apologia, chap. 16, in J. P. Migne, Patrologiæ Latinæ, Vol. 1, cols. 369-372; standard English translation in Ante-Nicene Fathers, (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913), Vol. 3, p. 31.

(11) For further research,see www.tertullian.org.

(12) Antonio Gallonio, De SS. Martyrum Cruciatibus, 1591.  Published in English: Tortures and Torments of the Christian Martyrs, A. R. Allinson, trans., (London: Fortune Press, 1903), p. 143.  The intent of the book was the “edification of the faithful” and published with the approval of the Roman Catholic Church. 

(13) Odom, op.cit., p. 158.

(14) I Corinthians 10:20

(15) This illustration was a copper-plate engraving done by Antonio Tempesta of Firenza (Florence) taken after the designs of Giovanni de Guerra of Modena, painter to Pope Sixtus V.

(16) Gallonio, Tortures and Torments of the Christian Martyrs, op.cit., p. 138.

(17) Jupiter’s Day, dies Jovis, corresponds to the modern Thursday.

(18) A. T. Jones, The Two Republics, (Ithaca, Michigan: A. B. Publishing, Inc., n.d.), pp. 320-321.

(19) Eusebius, Commentary on the Psalms, Psalm 91 (Psalm 92 in A.V.), in J. P. Migne, Patrologiæ Græccæ Cursus Completus, (Paris, 1856-1866),  Volume 23, column 1169.

(20) Eusebius, Proof of the Gospel, Book 4, chapter 16, translated by W. J. Ferrar, Vol. 1, p. 207 as quoted in ibid.

(21) E. Diehl, Inscriptiones Latinæ Christianæ Veteres, (Berolini, 1925), Vol. 2, p. 118, #3033.

(22)Ibid., p. 193, #3391.  See also, G. B. de Rossi, Inscriptiones Christianæ Urbis Romæ, Vol. 1, part 1, p. 18, #11.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/christianity-articles/changeling-christians-becoming-pagan-3842240.html

About the Author

At WorldsLastChance, the Bible and the Bible Alone is the rule of faith and duty.  WorldsLastChance is a group of nondenominational followers of Yahushua (Jesus) who are dedicated to spreading the awesome news that the second coming of Yahushua is only a few years away according to Bible prophecy.

 

 

This entry was posted in Alternative Energy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Changeling: Christians becoming Pagan

  1. JennyM says:

    Just looking for some general tips on living greener, things such as solar panels, etc, that won’t cost a lot to implement? Of course, solar panels cost a fortune, but it’s an example. Thanks!

  2. HunterH says:

    Hey Jenny,

    I actually just responded to another question of yours too a few minutes ago. I’ve been reviewing “green” manuals lately and found something called “Earth4Energy” – It’s a great guide with detailed information on how to build your own solar and wind power. You can check out my full review of it @ http://renewable-energy-info.com/ – Best of luck to ya!

  3. Peter says:

    Does anybody know if there are any courses for solar panel installation, and/or what trades you need for this position?

  4. Peterson says:

    hey buddy no need to go for a course or so whenever u buy a solar panel a manually comes with it with complete information on how to install a solar panel and you can always go for do it yourself things search on Google you will find the installation way however i can give a basic idea about the same like there would be two major setps one is electrically installation and second is manual also you need to know that you are going for a roof mounted panel or a ground mounted one so for starting Installing a solar panel power station is very easy. There are just a few steps you need to know. First read the information on the solar panels. The information you will require is the maximum wattage, voltage, and amps or amperes.

    A solar power system will require solar panels, voltage regulator, and batteries. The most common systems are 12 and 24 volt systems. The voltage regulator needs to be rated above the maximum voltage and current(amps) of the combined solar panels. The batteries will need to be deep cycle and when combined have the capacity to provide the amp hours needed for your situation.

    How to Electrically Install your Solar Panels

    Each solar panel will be wired to each other in parallel if you have more then one. When you wire in parallel the amps(current) from each panel will add to the total sum of current, but the total voltage stays the same. The voltage must match the rest of your system. For example, if your are using 12 volt solar panels you must be using 12 volt batteries and voltage regulator. Voltage regulator must be rated above maximum voltage and current(amps).

    Connect the output from the solar panels to a properly rated regulator, solar panel voltage regulators are rated by maximum voltage and amps, that will shut off the current flow to the batteries once the batteries are sufficiently charged there by preventing damage to the batteries.

    The way that you figure the rating needed for the regulator is by adding the maximum amps for each solar panel, this should be listed on the solar panel, and if they are 12 volt panels and they are connected in parallel then max voltage should be around 22 volts. It’s the amperes that is most importance when choosing a regulator. For example, a 50 watt 12 volt solar panel will give you around 3.5 amps max output, your voltage regulator needs to be at least rated above this vcalue. Any less and your going to cook the regulator and possible damage your batteries.

    Solar panels are very sturdy, it’s hard to damage them electrically. On the other hand it’s very easy to damage the regulator and batteries. Batteries can explode if connected wrong, so be carefully when working with batteries. Positive to positive and negative to negative.

    hope this will help you

  5. chiwashere says:

    Planets are in solar systems, solar systems are in galaxies, and galaxies are in the universe, so what is the universe in? How can something just be here? A theory of mine is mabey the universe is God. Perhaps it is a living thing. Since nothing on earth will ever know the true answers all I can do is speculate. I personally don’t think the answers will be found by math, which was created by humans.
    “The universe is nothing more than an atom of a larger thing. An atom in your fingernail could hold an entire universe in itself.”

    You got that from animal hour didn’t you? When i first heard that I thought, “cool” but then I thought about it just a little harder and realized that obviously isn’t possible and if it was, what would happen when the life form our universe is an atom of dies or whatever it is part of is destroyed?

  6. MJR says:

    The universe means, literally, everything that exists. Asking what exists beyond the universe is like asking what continents exist outside the Earth. If we can use reason to divine it’s existence, then it is part of the universe.

    People of course speculate. Anything not of this universe is termed “supernatural”. And because the supernatural can not be falsified (proven wrong), then it is not a truly scientific question. So your calling the universe ‘God’ (a philosophical thought that has existed for decades. Google “pantheism”) is purely arbitrary, faith based, unfalsifiable, and thus, not proper scientifically.

    As far as knowledge, the acquisition of knowledge and search for the truth has always been sketchy, but it is hypothesized that when we unlock the secrets of consciousness, we will finally have an objective standard for the truth, and that will change our society in profound ways. Possibly, we are on the verge of understanding consciousness, as neuroscientists delve further and further into the brain, unlocking mystery after mystery, we may eventually have a full understanding of how our brain creates ideas, and we can gauge which ideas have a proper base, and which do not.

    And your comment about math is conceptually wrong on so many levels it’s hard to count. Man didn’t ‘invent’ mathematics anymore than he ‘invented’ electricity (Electrons have always existed, Man simply discovered them and their uses).
    Einstein once wrote that “Mathematics is the language with which God wrote the universe”. Of course Einstein was being metaphorical about God, but the point is that 2 + 2 = 4, no matter how many people are counting.
    Even Descartes, who coined the term “I think, therefore I am” and who couldn’t be convinced that anything in the universe except his own conscious mind existed, believed that conceptual mathematics were the only universal constant, the only thing man could truly trust as existing.

  7. Lolmaster says:

    I CAN’ T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOLAR WINDS AND SOLAR STORMS. AND WHAT STARTS A SOLAR STORM/WIND

  8. jonal says:

    The solar wind is the stream of particles and radiation continously emitted by the Sun and affects bodies in orbit around it. For example the solar wind produces magnetic and radio interactions with the Van Allen belts around the Earth.
    http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/sun/wind.html
    It might also be used to propel a giant sail as a means of interplanetary travel some day.
    http://www.electric-sailing.com/

    The Sun is a very agitated body, with massive and rapidly changing magnetic fields and mass and radiation movements which can lead to violent eruptions and mass and radiation emmissions called solar storms. Coronal mass ejections can throw out tens of thousands of tons of matter in minutes, accompanied by severely increased levels of emmitted radiation. Increased material and radiation loss from storms of course adds to the solar wind, but the massively increased emmissions during storms can mess up comminications on Earth and even shut down power stations.
    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/14apr_3dcme.htm . . . . .
    http://solar.physics.montana.edu/press/WashPost/Horizon/196l-031099-idx.html . . . . .
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,478024,00.html . . . . . .

    Using the sea as an analogy, the solar wind is the like normal series of waves and swells ever present on the oceans. Seismic storms from earhquakes and volcanos generate the giant waves and tsunamis that wreak havoc where they reach land just as the massive radiation levels of solar storms do when they reach the magnetic and electrical fields around a planet like Earth.
    Tsunamis are only dangerous when they reach the lower water depths off-shore and the nature of the wave is forced to change.
    When they hit the land the waves are forced to give up their energy the full force of the waves is felt.
    In mid ocean there is nothing to interact with and nothing to harm.
    Likewise with radiation storms. It’s when they reach a magnetic or electrical field with which they interact that the harm is done.

  9. Butterfly says:

    Human aliens of course from other solar systems that mixed with Earthlings long ago to create different races and religions on planet Earth.
    Perhaps we may be descendants from different planets, and there may be less than half of the people on Earth who are true blooded native Earthlings? Wouldn’t this explain a lot?

    What do you think?

  10. Pascha says:

    I have considered that humans on earth may advance technologically enough to be able to travel to planets in other solar systems and galaxies Since our Earth won’t be viable for human life forever, we will need to do that for humanity to survive.
    . If that is so, then maybe we will find life forms similar to ours somewhere else in the universe.
    And perhaps life somewhere else in the universe has already developed ahead of ours, and those people have had the technology to travel here.

  11. kb says:

    A lot of solar hot water systems claim to also increase the value of your home but provide no real information regarding it. Who would determine this value or how might it be applied to the value of the home? If it does increase does this increase depreciate?

  12. TomA says:

    Yes of course it increases the value the real question is does it increase the value as much as it costs to install it. A smart Realtor might be your answer.

  13. ℑ❤ω∀✝ξℜ says:

    I was wondering how many solar cells you would need to power a small toy car. I don’t have a lot of knowledge about things like this, so if you could direct me to any websites or explain it, that would be great, thanks.(:

  14. Jon says:

    Well, first you need to figure out what your requirements are going to be, for example lets say 5v. Solar cells are cheap, these ones here are .55v http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2062564. You see that metal strip up top? That is the – and on the opposite side that is the +. You need to solder some wire on both ends and that is kind of tedious if you are not familiar with soldering so you can always get one of these. http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2131051 The wires are already soldered and it is in a nice little case too so it is protected.

    The one I linked is 6v though and you need 5v (like I said earlier for example). Since solar panels do not give consistent power since it depends on how much light they get you would need a voltage regulator. http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2062599 That is a 5v voltage regulator, meaning no matter how much light the solar cell is receiving it will only put out 5v, unless it is getting less than 5v of course. So it might be a good idea to get two of those 6v solar cells and connect them in series (connect the + to – of the two cells so the voltage goes up to 12v). The amperage may be an issue but this will depend on the load requirement as well, if it is just a small motor those cells should work fine. Send me an email if you are curious how the voltage regulator is wired up. To recap:

    1. Find out how much voltage/amperage your toy car is.
    2. Buy solar cells for those needs.
    3. Buy a voltage regulator for steady flow.
    4. Profit, easy as that.

  15. Silfan says:

    Price of Solar panels Vs Utility – is it really worth going for it?

  16. Kit says:

    The current wholesale price of solar panels from China is €0.46 per Watt peak (which means 32 Rupees per Watt peak).

    http://www.enfsolar.com/cell-panel-prices

    A typical panel is 250 Watt peaks. Which makes the panel €115 / 8000 Rupees. Of course buying small amounts locally will put up the price.

    People normally install 2,000 to 4,000 Watt peaks on their home. Historically people install panels to get special tariffs and these haven’t really existed for homes in India. But the price of panels have dropped dramatically in recent years and they are starting to become cheap enough to be interesting without government subsidies, but payback will still be very long.

  17. SanketSahu says:

    I want to setup solar panels to run 2 Air conditioner and simple lights. How much would be the approx cost in USD? I want to set it up India. If you’ve more idea about Indian market then thats better.

  18. Clint says:

    This means that what you would be powering with solar electricity are things like the refrigerator, the lights, the compute­r, the TV, stereo equipment, motors in things like furnace fans and the washer, etc. Let’s say that all of those things average out to 600 watts on average. Over the course of 24 hours, you need 600 watts * 24 hours = 14,400 watt-hours per day.

    I know that a solar panel can generate 70 milliwatts per square inch * 5 hours = 350 milliwatt hours per day. Therefore you need about 41,000 square inches of solar panel for the house. That’s a solar panel that measures about 285 square feet (about 26 square meters). That would cost around $16,000 right now. Then, because the sun only shines part of the time, you would need to purchase a battery bank, an inverter, etc., and that often doubles the cost of the installation.

    If you want to have a small room air conditioner in your bedroom, double everything.

    If you want to just power 2 small air conditioners, your look at about $32,000 +installation

  19. deepakc says:

    Why can solar energy be not used everywhere? Is it very expensive to tap it?

  20. crabby_blindguy3 says:

    Solar energy is (or was) very expensive, yes. That is changing. current costs versus long term power production are falling, however. At present, the cost is borderline.

    However, solar energy alone is not a complete answer. First of all, for the production of electricity, it has some problems. The main one, of course, is tha tit doesn’t work at night. You either need a storage system (batteries) or an alternative source when it’s dark or cloudy.

    There are alternatives which, combined with solar energy, can replace coal. Wind, existing hydroelectric systems, nuclear energy, and tidal power are some of them.

    Myy point is, don’t fall into thhe trap of fixating on a single all-encompassing cure-all technology. We need a mix of technologies. That’s true today–we use coal, oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, and other sources–a mix of technologies to provide our energy needs. We need to change themix–eliminating fossil fuels and incorporating new technologies to replace those fossil fuels. There is no simple solution.

    Now-as to oil–it is used primarily for transportation. In some ways it is ideal: its easy to store and the fuel stores the energy, whichis released when it’s burned.

    There are alternatives. The one I think the most practical is to use electric cars. Current technology makes electric cars with performance and adequate range possible at prices comparable to gas-powered cars (once they are produced in large numbers as gas-powered cars are). That’s acutally a solved problem. What we do not have is a way of producing the electricity to power all those cars (without buring oil or coal, which defeats the purpose) at present. For that–go back to the first part of this post.

    But we also do not have a practical infrastructure to deliver that electricity to a fleet of 150 millioncars (in the US). That is not a trivial problem. Think of what it takes to deliver a gallon of gas from an oil well to your car. Here’s the sequence. Oil well to pipeline (hundreds of miles) to refinery to another pipeline to atanker truck to an gas storage tank under a gas station and then a pump to take the gas out o fthe tank and deliver it to your car.

    And remember, you need tha tinfrastructure so comprehensive that it blankets an entire CONTINENT.

    You will need the samme for electric cars (or any other alternative).

    I don’t mean to discourage you–this is doable. We DID do jsut that in the early 20th century to make our current system of gs-driven cars possible. But that took decades–and a hellava lot of engineering and research.

    But–as to your question–we wil get solar power on a large scale in the foreseeable future. But we will need a lot more. It’s a complex problem–and a big one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *